2) xo_justfun_xo,
Fri Jan 20, 2012 6:57:40 pm

---

I got bored 1/2 way through.

3) nucular_tomato,
Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:00:40 pm

---

re: comment#2

4) erdos0,
Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:13:00 pm

---

agrees with: comment#2

5) erdos0,
Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:13:52 pm

---

re: comment#2
The material that he covers is interesting, but I knew all of it beforehand and in far greater depth. His coverage is so superficial that it seems almost like rambling about nothing.

6) xo_justfun_xo,
Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:17:01 pm

---

re: comment#3
Sorry. :( I'll skip to the end and see if the driving point is better. I like nerdy stuff so perhaps it's just me having an off day.

7) the_grim_zipper,
Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:27:47 pm

---

re: comment#5
It's a 4 minute introduction to the subject for laymen.

8) erdos0,
Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:30:08 pm

---

re: comment#7
There are better ways to do introductions for laymen. The first part is especially bad, because it seems so disjointed.

9) the_grim_zipper,
Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:42:35 pm

---

re: comment#8
He was a bit like a late night HSN pitchman for a moment. It's edu-tainment.

10) posy,
Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:47:37 pm

---

agrees with: comment#5

11) nucular_tomato,
Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:53:45 pm

---

re: comment#8
How was it disjointed?

12) erdos0,
Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:58:27 pm

---

re: comment#11
He moves on to the next topic without connecting it to the previous one until the second half unites them all. It's a very bad presentation style.